The following changes are recommended:
•More details and direction to support the action experience suggestions are needed to address the resource’s weakness in the areas of problem-solving, student engagement and positive view of the future.
•Specific instructions for students working in groups should be provided to ensure the elements of sound cooperative learning methodology are realized. Groups and group members should be given responsibilities including the recording of their findings in writing (which could be used to address the evaluation criterion) and the students should be guided through the steps of making a presentation as opposed to being instructed to merely ‘tell the class”.
•An adjudication process should be included in the game design in case the students are unable to reach an agreement as to each group’s fair share. This could involve an additional group of students or single representatives from each group who must make a final decision.
•More information than what is provided on the role play cards is required to truly represent the complexity of the issue. The role cards could serve as a first step in the groups understanding of its circumstance. Additional research into the challenges faced at each link in the chain should precede the presentation positions. This would allow the incorporation of the case studies into the main activity, truly address the multi-dimensional nature of the problem and permit the incorporation of environmental concerns.
Guidelines and/or suggestions for student assessment should be included. |